Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Hicks v. Federal Bureau of Prisons
as 5:2016cv03221
Petitioner:
Michael Hicks
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Winegar v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2014cv03196
Plaintiff:
Kelly J. Winegar
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, USP Leavenworth, Clinical Director and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hansen v. Maye et al
as 5:2014cv03193
Petitioner:
Brian Hansen
Respondent:
Claude Maye and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02024
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv02646
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Harvey v. Missouri Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2013cv03188
Plaintiff:
Walter Lee Harvey
Defendant:
Missouri Department of Corrections, United States Marshal Service, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mackovich v. Richardson et al
as 5:2013cv03064
Petitioner:
John Vincent Mackovich
Respondent:
(fnu) Richardson, Eric Holder and Federal Bureau of Prisons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Perry v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2012cv03100
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Perry
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, John Loftness, J. Grissom and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Watson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2012cv03091
Plaintiff:
Pierre Terron-Oneal Watson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Josh Evans, Lisa Hollingsworth and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perry v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2012cv03086
Plaintiff:
Jason L. Perry
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, J. Loftness, D. Treadway and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
