Cases 11 - 18 of 18
SIMONS v. WARDEN SHARTLE OF THE FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT FAIRTON, NEW JERSEY
as 1:2011cv05561
Petitioner:
CHEYENNE SIMONS
Defendant:
WARDEN SHARTLE OF THE FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION AT FAIRTON, NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ROSENBERG v. UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT et al
as 1:2011cv04150
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN H. ROSENBERG
Defendant:
UNITED STATES GOVERNMENT, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL ERIC HOLDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HICKMAN v. WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTION INSTITUTION
as 1:2010cv02938
Petitioner:
ROBERT HICKMAN
Respondent:
WARDEN, FEDERAL CORRECTION INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NAVARRETE v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2009cv03683
Plaintiff:
JOSE NAVARRETE
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, FEDERAL CORRECTIONS INSTITUTION and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BATIZ v. FEDERAL CORRECTIONS INSTITUTION, FORT DIX, NJ et al
as 1:2009cv02849
Plaintiff:
HERIBERTO BATIZ
Defendant:
FEDERAL CORRECTIONS INSTITUTION, FORT DIX, NJ, FEDERAL PRISON INDUSTRIES, INC., JAMES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
TOLEDO v. WARDEN, FAIRTON FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
as 1:2008cv03671
Petitioner:
JOHN TOLEDO
Respondent:
WARDEN, FAIRTON FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
WHITELEY v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT et al
as 1:2007cv02382
Petitioner:
VINCENT WHITELEY
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF CONNECTICUT, WARDEN OF FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION FORT DIX, NJ and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
JUDD v. FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL
as 1:2002cv05305
Plaintiff:
KEITH RUSSELL JUDD
Defendant:
FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE AT FORT DIX NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
