Cases 11 - 20 of 34
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00015
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv04638
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Foote v. Lumico Life Insurance Company
as 1:2018cv03719
Plaintiff:
Hilton Foote
Defendant:
Lumico Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
McAlister-Jones v. Foote
as 2:2015cv00202
Plaintiff:
Brandy N. McAlister-Jones
Defendant:
Dale Eugene Foote
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
AllianceMed, LLC et al v. Blue Cross And Blue Shield of Georgia, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00171
Plaintiff:
AllianceMed, LLC , Surgery Center of BJI, LLC , ENTI Surgery Center, LLC and others
Defendant:
Blue Cross And Blue Shield of Georgia, Inc. , Blue Cross Blue Shield Healthcare Plan of Georgia, Inc. and Anthem, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Foot Locker Retail, Inc. v. Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc.
as 1:2013cv03275
Plaintiff:
Foot Locker Retail, Inc.
Defendant:
Fog Cutter Capital Group Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9601
Dr. Osh & Associates Foot & Leg Clinic, PC v. Sentinel Insurance Company et al
as 1:2013cv03058
Plaintiff:
Dr. Osh & Associates Foot & Leg Clinic, PC
Defendant:
Sentinel Insurance Company and Hartford Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Foot Solutions, Inc. v. Fritzy Feet, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv00785
Plaintiff:
Foot Solutions, Inc.
Defendant:
Fritzy Feet, LLC and Michael Ellafrits
Murla v. Foote et al
as 1:2012cv01633
Plaintiff:
Sean Murla
Defendant:
Gregory E. Foote, Ashley Bartsch , Kellie C. Brady and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Kyres et al v. Foote et al
as 1:2012cv01497
Plaintiff:
Peter Kyres and Timothy Parker
Defendant:
Gregory E. Foote, Kellie C. Brady, C. E. Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
