Cases
Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv06251
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552
Luxottica Group S.p.A. et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2016cv07667
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Zhang Ziyi, Yiyi Zhang and others
Plaintiff: Luxottica Group S.p.A, Luxottica Group S.p.A. and Oakley, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Li v. Pinwei Life Restaurant Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv04108
Defendant: Li Fan, Guang Guo Lin, Qian Li Lin and others
Plaintiff: De Guo Li
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Chen v. Holder
as 12-2840
Petitioner: Guo Li Chen
Respondent: Eric H. Holder, Jr., United States Attorney General
Li v. Swineford et al
as 1:2012cv00398
Defendant: John Doe, Hector G. Montesporras, Robert C. Swineford and others
Plaintiff: De Guo Li
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Ai et al v. Chen et al
as 1:2011cv00014
Plaintiff: Fang Lin Ai, Fu Rong An, Fen Xiang Bai and others
Petitioner: Ju Cao , Dan Ping Chang , Jin Hai Chen and others
Defendant: Bo Chen , Hong Chen and Ju Mei Chen
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422
Li v. Holder, Jr. We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 09-9542
Petitioner: LIN GUO LI
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, JR., United States Attorney General
Lin Li v. Eric Holder, Jr.
as 09-71970
Petitioner: LIN GUO LI
Respondent: ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Zhang v. Zhang
as 1:2009cv05642
Plaintiff: Guo Li Zhang and Guo Li Zhang
Defendant: Ru Nan Zhang
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Type: Labor Plaintiff
USA v. Zong Li
as 08-10347
Plaintiff - Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant: ZONG GUO LI

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?