Cases 11 - 20 of 90
Hardy v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2022cv00506
Plaintiff:
Shayla Hardy
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hardy v. C.R. Bard Inc et al
as 2:2021cv04318
Plaintiff:
Christopher Hardy
Defendant:
C.R. Bard Inc and Davol Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hardy, III v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02716
Plaintiff:
James Hardy, III
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hardy et al v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02645
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Edward Hardy and Sheila Kaye Hardy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hardy v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2021cv01995
Plaintiff:
George Hardy
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Western Environmental Corporation v. Hardy Diagnostics et al
as 1:2021cv00194
Defendant:
Warren County Treasurer, U.S. Bank National Association, Hardy Diagnostics and others
Plaintiff:
Western Environmental Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hardy v. Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
as 2:2021cv00049
Defendant:
Davol, Inc./C.R. Bard, Inc. Polypropylene Hernia Mesh Products Liability Litigation
Plaintiff:
Robert Hardy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hardy v. CR Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2020cv06198
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and CR Bard Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Nina Hardy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hardy v. Phillips
as 1:2020cv02694
Respondent:
Warden Michael Phillips
Petitioner:
Jamil Hardy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01761
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
