Cases 11 - 20 of 24
Hite v. E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
as 2:2015cv01190
Plaintiff:
Charles Stephen Hite
Defendant:
E. I. du Pont de Nemours and Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hite v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp22751
Plaintiff:
Richard Hite
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Services, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02228
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00674
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hite v. AT&T
as 4:2010cv02635
Plaintiff:
Dorjan Hite
Defendant:
AT&T Disability Income Program
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Filing Error
as 4:2010cv02636
Defendant:
AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No.1
Plaintiff:
Dorjan Hite
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv02028
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Murphy v. Rite Hite International Dock & Door Safety Systems, et al
as 3:2009cv02507
Plaintiff:
Tracy Murphy
Defendant:
Rite Hite International Dock & Door Safety Systems, Rite Hite Corporation, John Doe, I and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Hancock et al v. C.B. Fleet Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2009sp80023
Plaintiff:
Sara Hancock, Jackson Hancock, Mary Lou Abrams and others
Defendant:
C.B. Fleet Company, Inc., C.B. Fleet Company, Inc., Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company v. Hite et al
as 1:2009cv00492
Defendant:
Lynna Donofrio, Brandon Hite and Julie Eggers
Plaintiff:
Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. and Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
