Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Needham v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation (TV1)
as 3:2013cv00738
Plaintiff:
Michael Needham
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Seeber v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
as 3:2013cv00741
Plaintiff:
Austin Seeber
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Van Dyke v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation et al
as 2:2013cv00303
Plaintiff:
Stanley Van Dyke
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation, Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Taylor v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
as 3:2013cv01088
Plaintiff:
Barbara Jean Taylor
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hutchinson v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation (TV3)
as 3:2013cv00554
Defendant:
Stryker Corporation and Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
Plaintiff:
Karen Hutchison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hayes v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
as 3:2013cv00545
Plaintiff:
Sheila M Hayes
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gardner v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
as 3:2013cv00544
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
Plaintiff:
Jerald W. Gardner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Vale et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
as 3:2013cv00927
Plaintiff:
Joanne Vale and Terry Vale
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Shewairy v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
as 3:2013cv00478
Plaintiff:
John Shewairy
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Miller v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation et al (TV3)
as 3:2013cv00392
Plaintiff:
Marian Miller
Defendant:
Howmedica Osteonics Corporation, Stryker Corporation and Stryker Sales Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
