Cases 11 - 19 of 19
United States of America v. Real Property known as 4912 Dinsmore Road, West Carrollton, Ohio 45449 et al
as 3:2016cv00515
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Real Property known as 4912 Dinsmore Road, West Carrollton, Ohio 45449, Account Heartland Federal Credit Union #6490 all contents, in the approximate amount of 52,762.10, 1991 240 Islander Boat, ID No. AGCC6988J091 and others
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
IDS Publishing Corporation v. Reiss Profile Europe, BV
as 2:2016cv00535
Plaintiff:
IDS Publishing Corporation
Defendant:
Reiss Profile Europe, BV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338
Hayslip v. IDS Property Casualty Insurance Companyy
as 2:2016cv00527
Plaintiff:
Lester M Hayslip
Defendant:
IDS Property Casualty Insurance Companyy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company v. Fox et. al.
as 3:2016cv00193
Plaintiff:
IDS Property Casualty Insurance Companyy
Defendant:
John Fox and Christina Fox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
MLP Technology, Inc. v. LifeMed ID, Inc.
as 5:2014cv00683
Plaintiff:
MLP Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
LifeMed ID, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Schuh v. IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company
as 3:2013cv02643
Plaintiff:
Ryan Schuh
Defendant:
IDS Property Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
MLP Technology, Inc. v. LifeMed ID, Inc.
as 5:2013cv00909
Plaintiff:
MLP Technology, Inc.
Defendant:
LifeMed ID, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145 Patent Infringement
Iding v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2010cv00387
Plaintiff:
James Iding
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Artromick International Inc et al v. Vaithilingam et al
as 2:2007cv01208
Plaintiff:
Artromick International Inc and IDS Acquisition, LLC
Defendant:
Subash Vaithilingam, Cynthia Quire, Intergrated Dispensing Systems, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Fraud
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
