Cases 11 - 20 of 4,501
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02522
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
OBERTING v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv02490
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Plaintiff:
DAVID OBERTING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
WALKER v. O'MALLEY
as 1:2024cv02491
Defendant:
MARTIN J. O'MALLEY
Plaintiff:
AUDRIENNE WALKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
SLOANE v. AUSTIN et al
as 1:2024cv02489
Plaintiff:
TRAVIS A. SLOANE
Defendant:
DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ARMY NATIONAL GUARD, CHRISTINE WORMUTH, NATIONAL GUARD BUREAU and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
MALEKMARZBAN et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 1:2024cv02497
Defendant:
ANTONY J. BLINKEN, MORA NAMDAR, MICHAEL GOLDMAN and others
Plaintiff:
FARSHID MALEK MARZBAN and NILOUFAR MALEKMARZBAN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
JAIYEOLA v. NEFF et al
as 1:2024cv02550
Defendant:
SALLY J. BERENS and JANET T. NEFF
Plaintiff:
GANIYU AYINLA JAIYEOLA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CALZADA v. ROBERTS et al
as 1:2024cv02477
Defendant:
JOHN G. ROBERTS and ROBERT J. CONRAD
Plaintiff:
OMAR JOSE CALZADA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02473
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
MILLHOUSE v. DEL TORO
as 1:2024cv02468
Defendant:
CARLOS DEL TORO
Plaintiff:
KYLE J MILLHOUSE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706 Judicial Review of Agency Actions
LEON et al v. AT&T INC. et al
as 1:2024cv02397
Plaintiff:
RICHARD INZA, MICHAEL INZA and RAY LEON
Defendant:
STEPHEN J LUCZO, WILLIAM E. KENNARD, JOHN STANKEY and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
