Cases 11 - 20 of 87
Haye v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP et al
as 4:2020cv00556
Plaintiff:
Allan Haye
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank N.A. Successor Non-Existent Flagstone Lending Group and McCarthy & Holthus LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raymond v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, et al
as 5:2020cv00161
Defendant:
Flagstar Bank and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank
Plaintiff:
Carlos Antonio Raymond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Watson v. J.P Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
as 3:2019cv02612
Plaintiff:
Karen Kaye Watson
Defendant:
J.P Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and JP Morgan Chase Bank NA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Raymond v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 5:2019cv00596
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank and Flag Star Bank
Plaintiff:
Carlos Antonio Raymond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Incorrectly Filed
as 4:2019cv00630
Defendant:
McCarthy & Holthus, LLP, on Behalf of Flagstone Lending Group A Non-Existent Utah Corp. and Succesor/Assignee J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Allan Haye
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Haye v. McCarthy & Holthus LLP
as 4:2019cv00632
Plaintiff:
Allan Haye
Defendant:
McCarthy & Holthus, LLP, on Behalf of Flagstone Lending Group A Non-Existent Utah Corp. and Succesor/Assignee J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fagan v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank et al
as 5:2019mc00111
Respondent:
J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, Citibank N.A., Chase Bank and others
Petitioner:
Edward D. Fagan
In Re:
LETTER ROGATORY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1782
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pearson v. J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al
as 4:2018cv00694
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and J.P. Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.
Plaintiff:
Edward L. Pearson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv03549
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
