Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Biggins v. State of Delaware et al
as 1:2014cv00844
Petitioner:
James Arthur Biggins
Respondent:
State of Delaware, David Pierce and Attorney General of State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Biggins v. Delaware Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2013cv01688
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Delaware Dept. of Corrections and Correct Care Solutions Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Biggins v. Danberg et al
as 1:2012cv01666
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Carl C. Danberg, Christopher Klien, Michael Deloy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Biggins v. Delaware Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2012cv00586
Petitioner:
James Arthur Biggins
Respondent:
Delaware Department of Corrections, Carl C. Danberg, Perry Phelps and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Biggins v. Zeobouty et al
as 1:2011cv00662
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Zeobouty, Gordon, Chelsia Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggins v. Little et al
as 1:2011cv00478
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Michael Little, Burris, Stoddart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggins v. Green et al
as 1:2011cv00473
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Green, Kiesser, Telb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggins v. Phelps et al
as 1:2011cv00388
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
Perry Phelps, Christopher Klien, David Pierce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Biggins v. Phelps et al
as 1:2011cv00366
Petitioner:
James Arthur Biggins
Respondent:
Perry Phelps, Joseph F. Biden, III and Attorney General of the State of Delaware
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Biggins v. Gile et al
as 1:2011cv00365
Plaintiff:
James Arthur Biggins
Defendant:
George Gile, Mark D. Daum, Marcili Rispoli and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
