Cases 11 - 20 of 318
Sumpter v. Dowling
as 5:2022cv00862
Petitioner:
Keith Sumpter and Keith Lorenzo Sumpter
Respondent:
Janet Dowling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
July v. Dowling
as 4:2022cv00393
Petitioner:
George Emile July
Respondent:
Janet Dowling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Dunbar v. Dowling
as 5:2022cv00728
Petitioner:
Damon Neal Dunbar, Jr
Respondent:
Janet Dowling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
July v. Dowling
as 6:2022cv00214
Petitioner:
Wiley Gene July
Respondent:
Janet Dowling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sumpter v. Dowling
as 4:2022cv00343
Petitioner:
Keith Sumpter and Keith Lorenzo Sumpter
Respondent:
Janet Dowling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
American General Life Insurance Company v. Morrill et al
as 5:2022cv00634
Plaintiff:
American General Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
Janet L Morrill, Jeremy M Morrill, Jennfier Collyar and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Bridges v. Gates et al
as 4:2022cv00322
Plaintiff:
Kris Edward Bridges, II
Defendant:
Kevin Gates, White Boy, Billy Conn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gaines v. Dowling
as 5:2022cv00543
Petitioner:
Rodney E Gaines
Respondent:
Janet Dowling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mayes v. Dowling et al
as 5:2022cv00437
Petitioner:
Lawrence L Mayes
Respondent:
Janet Dowling and K Nikki Kirpatrick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Caldwell v. Dowling
as 5:2022cv00340
Petitioner:
Jimmy Caldwell
Respondent:
Janet Dowling
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
