Cases 11 - 20 of 38
Pinson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2013cv02681
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Anthony Osagie, David Allred and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pinson v. Snider et al
as 1:2013cv01990
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
Sean Snider, Armijo, J. Garner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinson v. Berkebile
as 1:2013cv01953
Petitioner:
Jeremy Pinson
Respondent:
David Berkebile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pinson v. Armijo et al
as 1:2013cv01567
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
Armijo, Shatto, Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinson v. Casden et al
as 1:2013cv01384
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
Casden
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinson v. Berkebile
as 1:2013cv01383
Petitioner:
Jeremy Pinson
Respondent:
David Berkebile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pinson et al v. No Defendants Named
as 1:2013cv00651
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson and Charles Hipps
Defendant:
No Defendants Named
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hipps et al v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2013cv00604
Plaintiff:
Charles Hipps, Antoine Bruce, Michael Bacote and others
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, P. Klein, S. Kuta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinson v. Federal Bureau of Prisons et al
as 1:2013cv00749
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Anthony Osagie, David Allred and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pinson et al v. Madison et al
as 1:2013cv00157
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Pinson and Erwin Villatoro
Defendant:
Richard Madison, Patricia Rangel, S. Kuta and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
