Cases 11 - 20 of 35
Lamont Heard v. Patricia Caruso, et al
as 12-1517
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LAMONT BERNARD HEARD
Defendant:
PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Director
Defendant - Appellee:
DENNIS STRAUB, Deputy Director of the MDOC, DAVE J. BURNETT, MDOC Special Activities Coordinator, ROBERT MULVANEY, MDOC Security Threat Group and others
Lamont Heard v. Patricia Caruso, et al
as 12-1517
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMONT BERNARD HEARD
Defendant:
PATRICIA CARUSO
Defendant / Appellee:
DENNIS M. STRAUB, Warden, Deputy Director of the MDOC, DAVE J. BURNETT, MDOC Special Activities Coordinator, ROBERT MULVANEY, MDOC Security Threat Group and others
Cesar Valladolid v. Jeri-Ann Sherry
as 11-2270
Petitioner - Appellant:
CESAR VALLADOLID
Respondent - Appellee:
JERI-ANN SHERRY, Warden
Sherman Austin v. Jeri-Ann Sherry
as 11-2233
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHERMAN AUSTIN
Respondent - Appellee:
JERI-ANN SHERRY, Warden
Bobby Smith v. Jeri-Ann Sherry
as 11-1608
Petitioner - Appellant:
BOBBY WAYNE SMITH
Respondent - Appellee:
JERI-ANN SHERRY, Warden
John Cadarette v. Jeri-Ann Sherry, et al
as 11-1245
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN MICHAEL CADARETTE
Defendant - Appellee:
JERI-ANN SHERRY, Warden, Regional Prison Administrator, IAN MACDONALD, Facility Inspector and T. MACKIE, Deputy Warden
William Johnson v. Jeri-Ann Sherry
as 10-2699
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM JOHNSON
Respondent - Appellee:
JERI-ANN SHERRY, Warden
Clinton Chandler v. Jeri-Ann Sherry
as 10-2678
Petitioner - Appellant:
CLINTON CHANDLER
Respondent - Appellee:
JERI-ANN SHERRY, Warden
Charles Selby v. Patricia Caruso, et al
as 10-2459
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES J. SELBY
Defendant - Appellee:
PATRICIA L. CARUSO, Director, JAMES MACMEEKIN, JERI-ANN SHERRY, Warden and others
Lindell Brown v. Jeri-Ann Sherry
as 10-2442
Petitioner - Appellant:
LINDELL BROWN
Respondent - Appellee:
JERI-ANN SHERRY, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
