Cases 11 - 20 of 41
Billy Davis v. John Fox
as 12-40929
Petitioner - Appellant:
BILLY D. DAVIS
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN B. FOX, Warden, Beaumont USP
David Pardue v. John Fox
as 12-40909
Petitioner - Appellant:
DAVID PRESTON PARDUE
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN B. FOX, Warden
Timothy Wise v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 12-40527
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY SCOTT WISE
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY G LAPPIN, Director, Bureau of Prisons, G MALDONADO, JR., South Central Regional Director, Bureau of Prisons, HARRELL WATTS, National Inmate Appeals Administrator and others
Lourelle Roberts v. State of Louisiana
as 12-30150
Petitioner - Appellant:
LOURELLE ROBERTS, also known as Lourele Roberts, also known as Laurele Roberts, also known as Laurelle Roberts
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN B FOX, Warden, United States Penitentiary Beaumont
Porter Bush v. John Fox
as 11-40410
Petitioner - Appellant:
PORTER LEE BUSH
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN B FOX, Warden
Thomas Cleveland v. John Fox
as 11-40276
Petitioner - Appellant:
THOMAS CLEVELAND
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN B FOX, Warden
Everildo Garcia v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, et al
as 11-40153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EVERILDO GARCIA
Defendant - Appellee:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL BRANCH, JOHN B FOX, Warden and others
Okey Okpala v. Harley Lappin, et al
as 10-40959
Plaintiff - Appellant:
OKEY GARRY OKPALA
Defendant - Appellee:
HARLEY LAPPIN, Director, Federal Bureau of Prison, Washington, D.C., JOHN B FOX, Warden, U.S. Penitentiary, Beaumont, Texas, CONSTANLE REESE, Warden, Federal Correctional Institution, Talladega, Alabama and others
Arthur Reader v. John Fox, et al
as 10-40872
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ARTHUR CHARLES READER
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN B FOX, Warden, UP LOCICFRO, Correctional Officer, K. ASHLER, Lieutenant and others
Steven Montague v. John Fox
as 10-40227
Petitioner - Appellant:
STEVEN DAVID MONTAGUE
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN B FOX, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
