Cases 11 - 20 of 20
McGill v. Crosby et al
as 2:2008cv00205
Plaintiff:
John McGill
Defendant:
James Crosby, Dr. Smith, R. Hemphill and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2008cv00042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
McGill v. Crosby et al
as 1:2007cv23171
Plaintiff:
John McGill
Defendant:
James Crosby, Smith, R. Hemphill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Cole v. State Of Florida et al
as 3:2007cv00992
Petitioner:
Lorenzo Cole
Respondent:
State Of Florida and James Crosby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JAMES V. CROSBY
as 1:2007cv00152
Plaintiff:
ALPHONSO JAMES, SR
Defendant:
JAMES CROSBY, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 9607 Real Property Tort to Land
Calhoun v. Florida Dept. of Corrections et al
as 3:2007cv00369
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Calhoun
Defendant:
Florida Dept. of Corrections, James Crosby, Mark Redd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crosby v. Tate & Kirlin Associates, Inc. et al
as 5:2007cv00171
Plaintiff:
James Crosby
Defendant:
Tate & Kirlin Associates, Inc., LVNV Funding, LLC, Mark Brewer and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
COLE v. CROSBY et al
as 4:2007cv00190
Petitioner:
LORENZO COLE
Respondent:
JAMES CROSBY and STATE OF FLORIDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Calhoun v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2007cv00286
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. Calhoun
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections, James Crosby, Mark Redd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON v. MCDONOUGH et al
as 4:2007cv00101
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE ROBINSON
Defendant:
JAMES MCDONOUGH, JAMES CROSBY, ORLESTER DICKENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
