Cases 11 - 20 of 2,719
Dida v. Doe 1
as 3:2024cv01407
Plaintiff:
Mohamed Dida
Defendant:
Jane Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haslett v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01403
Plaintiff:
Darryl Haslett
Defendant:
John Doe 1, Jane Doe 1 and John Doe 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gully v. Myers et al
as 3:2024cv01404
Plaintiff:
Brandon Gully
Defendant:
Percy Myers, Wexford Health Sources Inc and Jane Doe 1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Snow v. Grootens et al
as 3:2024cv03135
Plaintiff:
Justin Snow
Defendant:
Anthony Grootens, Brian Curran, Deana Coleman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Cermak Health Services et al
as 1:2024cv04522
Plaintiff:
Maurice Barnes
Defendant:
Cermak Health Services, John Doe 1, Susan Shobol and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pyles v. Does
as 1:2024cv01197
Plaintiff:
Terry Pyles
Defendant:
John/Jane Does and Joseph Rizzi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Doe et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv04324
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE #1 and JOHN DOE #2
Defendant:
MERRICK B GARLAND, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Johnson v. Sadler et al
as 3:2024cv01385
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Johnson
Defendant:
B. Sadler, Wexford Corporate, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kuhn v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv03129
Plaintiff:
Alexander Kuhn
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections (Latoya Hughes), Graham Correctional Center (Steven Campbell), Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Olden v. Greene et al
as 3:2024cv03130
Plaintiff:
Terrance Olden
Defendant:
Brittany Greene, . Clarkson, Christy Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
