Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00069
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
Jerdine v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009cv02037
Petitioner:
Anthony Jerdine
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden Rushing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jerdine v. United States of America et al
as 1:2009mc00025
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jerdine
Defendant:
United States of America and William J. Edwards
Jerdine et al v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation et al
as 1:2009cv00307
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jerdine and Darryl Jerdine
Defendant:
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Washington Mutual Bank FA, Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jerdine v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv00007
Petitioner:
Anthony L. Jerdine
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Jerdine v. United States of America
as 1:2009cv00098
Petitioner:
Anthony L. Jerdine
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Marous Brothers Construction, Inc. et al v. Jerdine
as 1:2008cv01740
Plaintiff:
Marous Brothers Construction, Inc. and Marous Magnate LLC
Defendant:
Anthony L. Jerdine
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jerdine v. USA
as 1:2008cv00930
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Anthony L. Jerdine
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Jerdine v. Johnson et al
as 1:2007cv03193
Petitioner:
Anthony L. Jerdine
Respondent:
Greg Johnson, Peter D. Keisler, Federal Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Jerdine et al v. Washington Mutual Bank et al
as 1:2007cv02984
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jerdine
Defendant:
Washington Mutual Bank, Bridget M. McCafferty and Gerald T. McFaul
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
