Cases 11 - 20 of 1,966
Doe et al v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv04324
Plaintiff:
JANE DOE, JOHN DOE #1 and JOHN DOE #2
Defendant:
MERRICK B GARLAND, Alejandro Mayorkas, Ur Mendoza Jaddou and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0701 Administrative Procedure Act
Gilbert v. Hughes et al
as 3:2024cv01394
Plaintiff:
Robert Gilbert
Defendant:
Latonya Hughes, Robb Jeffreys, Adewale Kuforiji and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Sadler et al
as 3:2024cv01385
Plaintiff:
Larry D. Johnson
Defendant:
B. Sadler, Wexford Corporate, John Doe 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cox v. Jeffreys et al
as 3:2024cv01375
Plaintiff:
Carmen Cox
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kaizuka v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2024pq01357
Plaintiff:
Kathleen Kaizuka
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection LLC, Chevron U.S.A Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Wills et al
as 3:2024cv01280
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Johnson
Defendant:
Anthony D. Wills, Nurse Crane, Nurse Crain and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01285
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01288
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01286
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
John Doe #1 and David Michell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Miles v. Doe 1 et al
as 3:2024cv01289
Plaintiff:
Billy Miles
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2 and David Mitchell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
