Cases 11 - 20 of 396
Collins v. Wiekrykas et al
as 1:2016cv01029
Plaintiff:
Johnny Collins
Defendant:
J. Wiekrykas, John Kerestes and Dorina Varner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CHHEA v. KERESTES et al
as 2:2016cv02692
Petitioner:
RICKY B. CHHEA
Respondent:
JOHN KERESTES, PHILADELPHIA D.A. OFFICE and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
McNesby v. Heenan et al
as 3:2016cv00602
Plaintiff:
Dave McNesby
Defendant:
M. Heenan, John Kerestes and Dorina Varner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Payne v. Kerestes et al
as 3:2016cv00372
Plaintiff:
Joshua I Payne
Defendant:
John Kerestes, Hugh Beggs, Jeanne Macknight and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tillery v. Wetzel et al
as 3:2016cv00235
Plaintiff:
Major George Tillery
Defendant:
John Wetzel, John Kerestes, Brenda Tritt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BITTING v. KERESTES et al
as 2:2016cv00578
Petitioner:
JOHN DOUGLAS BITTING, IV
Respondent:
JOHN KERESTES and PA STATE ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Bitting IV v. Kerestes
as 3:2016cv00172
Respondent:
John Kerestes and PA State Attorney General
Petitioner:
John Douglas Bitting IV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
PENA v. KERESTES et al
as 2:2015cv06632
Petitioner:
JONATHAN PENA
Respondent:
JOHN KERESTES, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF PHILADELPHIA and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
OSBURNE v. KERESTES et al
as 2:2015cv06493
Petitioner:
FURMAN OSBURNE
Respondent:
JOHN KERESTES, THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA and DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF PHILADELPHIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Stafford v. Corizon Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv02333
Plaintiff:
Anthony Stafford
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Inc., PHS Inc., PA Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
