Cases 11 - 20 of 16,390
Johnson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02883
Plaintiff:
Johnson Regina
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02867
Plaintiff:
Virgil Johnson
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02818
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Davol Inc et al
as 2:2024cv02816
Plaintiff:
Keith Johnson
Defendant:
Davol Inc and CR Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson, Jr. v. Maiorana
as 4:2024cv00898
Petitioner:
Melvin E. Johnson, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Charles Maiorana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
City of Barberton v. 3M Company et al.
as 5:2024cv00890
Defendant:
3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company and others
Plaintiff:
City of Barberton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Johnson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02644
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Johnson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Indivior Inc. et al.
as 1:2024sf65634
Plaintiff:
Julius I. Johnson
Defendant:
Indivior Inc., Indivior PLC, Indivior Solutions, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Johnson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02383
Plaintiff:
Craig E. Johnson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C. R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
White v. ODRC Director et al
as 1:2024cv00270
Plaintiff:
Larry White
Defendant:
ODRC Director, Le.C.I Warden, Le.C.I Warden's Ms. Myers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
