Cases 11 - 20 of 149
Garcia v. Tucker et al
as 2:2013cv00688
Plaintiff:
Sean Garcia
Defendant:
Kenneth Tucker, Warden of DeSoto C.I., William J. Safford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hamze v. Crews et al
as 3:2013cv00857
Plaintiff:
Abdelaziz Bilal Hamze
Defendant:
Michael Crews, Kenneth Tucker, Singer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hamze v. Crews et al
as 6:2013cv01056
Plaintiff:
Abdelaziz Bilal Hamze
Defendant:
Michael Crews, Kenneth Tucker, Singer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Tucker
as 2:2013cv14271
Plaintiff:
Cal R. Haynes
Defendant:
Kenneth Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hubbard v. Tucker
as 0:2013cv61476
Plaintiff:
Marv A. Hubbard
Defendant:
Kenneth Tucker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SPARKLIN v. TUCKER et al.
as 5:2013cv00235
Plaintiff:
RANDY LEE SPARKLIN
Defendant:
KENNETH TUCKER, KENNETH WILKERSON, D GWADZA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Tucker et al
as 2:2013cv00475
Plaintiff:
Earnest Clark
Defendant:
Kenneth Tucker, Warden Chapam, FNU Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Tucker et al
as 8:2013cv02006
Plaintiff:
Earnest Clark
Defendant:
Kenneth Tucker, Warden Chapam, FNU Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ANDERSON v. STATE OF FLORIDA et al.
as 5:2013cv00221
Plaintiff:
IVAN ANDERSON
Defendant:
STATE OF FLORIDA, KENNETH TUCKER and BRAYANT RANDALL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LEWIS v. KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK LLC
as 4:2013cv00266
Plaintiff:
JAMES H LEWIS
Defendant:
KEEFE COMMISSARY NETWORK LLC and KENNETH TUCKER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
