Cases 11 - 20 of 26
O'HEARN v. KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC. et al
as 1:2020cv00444
Defendant:
KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC. and JOHN DOES 1-5 AND 6-10
Plaintiff:
FRANCIS O'HEARN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
KASTURAS v. KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORE, INC. et al
as 2:2020cv00322
Plaintiff:
GRACE KASTURAS
Defendant:
KOHL'S CORPORATION, KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORE, INC., ABC CORP. 1-X and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VAN DINA et al v. DIVERSIFIED MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS, LLC et al
as 2:2019cv21969
Defendant:
KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORE and DIVERSIFIED MAINTENANCE SYSTEMS, LLC
Plaintiff:
THOMAS VAN DINA and MAGNOLIA VAN DINA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv16950
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
RASPA v. KOHLS DEPARTMENT STORES et al
as 3:2018cv05107
Defendant:
KOHLS DEPARTMENT STORES , JOHN/JANE DOES 1-10 and ABC CORPS. 1-10
Plaintiff:
CHARLOTTE RASPA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
RUBERT v. KOHLS DEPARTMENT STORES
as 3:2017cv02991
Plaintiff:
JUSTIN RUBERT
Defendant:
KOHLS DEPARTMENT STORES
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 (b)(3) Telephone Consumer Protection Act of 1991
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv03627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
VOLINSKI v. TERVIS TUMBLER COMPANY et al
as 1:2014cv07616
Plaintiff:
JESSICA ANN VOLINSKI
Defendant:
TERVIS TUMBLER COMPANY and KOHLS DEPARTMENT STORES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
COYLE et al v. KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv04650
Plaintiff:
ROSEMARY COYLE and MICHAEL COYLE, SR.
Defendant:
KOHL'S DEPARTMENT STORES, INC. and JOHN DOES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
SIMPSON v. KOHLS DEPARTMENT STORE et al
as 3:2012cv02679
Plaintiff:
JOAN SIMPSON
Defendant:
KOHLS DEPARTMENT STORE , ABC CORPORATION, INC. and DEF COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
