Cases filed in Ohio
Cases 11 - 17 of 17
Hill v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp23759
Plaintiff: Stephen L. Hill
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Gruszecki et al v. Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC et al
as 4:2012cv01746
Plaintiff: Daniel A. Gruszecki , Sandra A. Gruszecki , Richard J. Dowd and others
Defendant: Columbia Gas Transmission, LLC and NiSource Energy Ventures, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hill v. Commissioner Social Security We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2012cv00268
Plaintiff: Cheryl L Hill
Defendant: Commissioner Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hill v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp20102
Plaintiff: Brenda L. Hill
Defendant: DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cincinnati Insurance Companies v. United Rentals, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv00216
Plaintiff: Cincinnati Insurance Companies
Defendant: United Rentals, Inc., Stephanie L. Hill and Valley Interios Systems, Inc.
ThirdParty Plaintiff: United Rentals, Inc.
ThirdParty Defendant: Valley Interios Systems, Inc.
Counter Claimant: United Rentals, Inc.
Counter Defendant: Cincinnati Insurance Companies
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Type: Contract Defendant
Hill v. Warden Ross Correctional Institution
as 2:2007cv00539
Petitioner: Matthew L Hill
Respondent: Warden Ross Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Warden Noble Correctional Institution We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2007cv00222
Petitioner: Robert L. Hill
Respondent: Warden Noble Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?