Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Robinson (ID 85853) v. Petersen
as 5:2022cv03031
Petitioner:
Charvelle Lamont Robinson
Respondent:
Hazel Petersen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Elevate Enterprises LLC et al
as 2:2021cv02599
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Elevate Enterprises LLC a Kansas limited liability company doing business as Elevate Bar & Grill, Adrian Lamont Jasper, Lynnette Jasper and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151 Communications Act of 1934
Williams v. Weiter et al
as 5:2021cv03077
Defendant:
Daniella Weiter and Tyler Vaughn
Plaintiff:
Casey Lamont Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Bunting et al
as 5:2021cv03078
Defendant:
B. Phralcornklen, (fnu) Coleman, (fnu) Griffith and others
Plaintiff:
Casey Lamont Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Trotter (ID 79061) v. Cline et al
as 5:2020cv03230
Plaintiff:
Eric LaMont Trotter
Defendant:
EAI, El Dorado Correctional Facility, Sam Cline and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Theus v. Wyandotte County Adult Detention Center et al
as 5:2020cv03070
Defendant:
Wyandotte County Adult Detention Center, Charles Patrick and Sara Toms
Plaintiff:
Jerome Lamont Theus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Love (ID 108486) v. Langford
as 5:2020cv03067
Petitioner:
Troy Lamont Love, II
Respondent:
Don Langford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Drayton v. USA ***DO NOT FILE IN THIS CASE. All filings to be made in criminal case 10-20018-01.
as 2:2019cv02758
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Lamont T. Drayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Drayton v. United States of America
as 5:2019cv03166
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Lamont T. Drayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Drayton v. USA
as 2:2019cv02032
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Lamont T. Drayton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
