Cases 11 - 18 of 18
South Carolina, State of v. LG Display CO Ltd et al
as 3:2011cv00729
Plaintiff:
South Carolina, State of
Defendant:
LG Display CO Ltd and LG Display America Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Judy v. LG Electronics USA Inc et al
as 2:2010cv02591
Plaintiff:
Mark Judy
Defendant:
LG Electronics USA Inc , LG Holding Company LLC, LG Group Inc, The and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Quinn et al v. LG Electronics USA Inc
as 3:2008cv03575
Plaintiff:
Richard Quinn, Richard Quinn, Amy Quinn and others
Defendant:
LG Electronics USA Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Glanz v. Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd et al
as 4:2007cv04175
Plaintiff:
Greg A Glanz, Greg A Glanz, Greg A Glanz and others
Defendant:
Chunghwa Picture Tubes Ltd, Tatung Company of America Inc, LG Electronics Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Sloan v. LG Philips LCD Co Ltd et al
as 6:2007cv00918
Plaintiff:
Gregory P Sloan, Gregory P Sloan and Gregory P Sloan
Defendant:
LG Philips LCD Co Ltd, LG Philips LCD America Inc, Samsung Electronics Co Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Sweatman v. LG Philips LCD Company Ltd et al
as 2:2007cv00781
Plaintiff:
Lynn Sweatman
Defendant:
LG Philips LCD Co Ltd, LG Philips LCD America Inc, LG Electronics Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Pellitteri et al v. LG Philips LCD Co Ltd et al
as 2:2007cv00780
Plaintiff:
Carman Pellitteri and Jeannie Pellitteri
Defendant:
LG Philips LCD Co Ltd, LG Philips LCD America Inc, LG Electronics Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Chamberlain v. LG Philips LCD Co Ltd et al
as 3:2007cv00533
Plaintiff:
Lee R Chamberlain and Lee R Chamberlain
Defendant:
LG Philips LCD Co Ltd, LG Philips LCD America Inc, Samsung Electronics Co Ltd and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Anti-trust
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
