Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06297
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination
Money v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2015cv03213
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson , Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. and Luxottica Retail North America, Inc. d/b/a Lenscrafters, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Stephen Money
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Adam Berenato v. Luxottica Retail North America Inc et al
as 8:2014cv02038
Plaintiff:
Adam Berenato
Defendant:
Does and Luxottica Retail North America Inc
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02132
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Page v. Luxottica Retail North America, Inc. et al
as 2:2013at00703
Plaintiff:
Lendsie Page
Defendant:
Luxottica Retail North America, Inc. and EYEXAM of California, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Page v. Luxottica Retail North America Inc., et al
as 2:2013cv01333
Plaintiff:
Lendsie Page
Defendant:
Luxottica Retail North America, Inc. and Eyexam of California, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv07693
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center v. Blue Cross of California et al
as 2:2012cv07008
Defendant:
PGFC, Inc. Employee Benefits Plan, Skechers USA, Inc., Vertis, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Pomona Valley Hospital Medical Center
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Luxottica Retail North America Inc et al v. Michael Ho et al
as 2:2012cv06689
Defendant:
Does and Michael Ho
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S p A and Luxottica Retail North America Inc
Luxottica Retail North America Inc et al v. John Casey Christian et al
as 2:2012cv06569
Defendant:
John Casey Christian and Does
Plaintiff:
Luxottica Group S p A and Luxottica Retail North America Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
