Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00349
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
LANE et al v. INSURANCE, MAINE BUREAU SUPERINTENDENT
as 1:2011cv00062
Plaintiff:
MARK LANE and ADVANTAGE SENIOR ADVISORY GROUP INC
Defendant:
INSURANCE, MAINE BUREAU SUPERINTENDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00049
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LANE v. SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
as 2:2010cv00162
Plaintiff:
LOIS LANE
Defendant:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION COMMISSIONER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00160
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MAINE STATE OF et al v. ALLEN GREIG & PERRY INC et al
as 1:2009cv00484
Plaintiff:
MAINE, STATE OF and ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION, MAINE DEPARTMENT OF
Defendant:
ALLEN GREIG & PERRY INC, AMOCO UNION, BANGOR TIRE CO and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
USA v. ALLEN GREIG & PERRY INC et al
as 1:2009cv00482
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
ALLEN GREIG & PERRY INC, AMOCO UNION, BANGOR TIRE CO and others
Consol_plaintiff:
MAINE, STATE OF and ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Plaintiff
CLARK et al v. LANE
as 1:2008cv00443
Plaintiff:
TOBY CLARK and TODD CLARK
Defendant:
AMANDA LANE and ALLSTATE INSURANCE COMPANY OF CANADA
Counter_claimant:
AMANDA LANE
Counter_defendant:
TOBY CLARK
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00154
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv00155
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
