Cases 11 - 20 of 58
Lankford v. JUUL Labs, Inc. et al
as 3:2020cv03815
Defendant:
Philip Morris USA Inc, John Does 1-100, Inclusive, NJOY, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Dathan Lankford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Moore v. Lankford et al
as 3:2019cv02406
Defendant:
Joe Lankford, David Stromski, R. Buckel and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Moore
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
(PC) Parks v. Abdur-Rahman et al
as 2:2019cv01827
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Parks
Defendant:
Randall Lankford and Salahuddin Abdur-Rahman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Parks v. Abdur-Rahman et al
as 2:2019cv01589
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Parks
Defendant:
Randall Lankford and Salahuddin Abdur-Rahman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lankford et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 5:2018cv02485
Plaintiff:
Brady Lankford , Trent Clinton Go and Jodie L. Kasun
Defendant:
Apple, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Von Renegar v. Anderson et al
as 3:2017cv04961
Plaintiff:
Eric Von Renegar
Defendant:
Donald Arther Anderson, Megan Dale van Steenburgh Lankford, Susan Janine Krones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nexium Esomeprazole
as 2:2012ml02404
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Marquerite Echols, Mae Joyce Terry, Peggy Kezer and others
Plaintiff:
Wesley Richardson, Rebecca Reid, Angelena Moore and others
Defendant:
KBI Sub Inc and AstraZeneca LP
Consolidated Defendant:
Sherry Simmons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sisco v. McDonald et al
as 2:2016cv01519
Plaintiff:
Eric M. Sisco
Defendant:
M.D. McDonald, B. Barker, Lankford and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dennis v. Kerman et al
as 2:2016cv00542
Plaintiff:
Matthew Dennis
Defendant:
Scott Kerman, J. Clark Kelso, J. Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garcia v. Greenleaf et al
as 2:2016at00125
Plaintiff:
Brandon Michael Garcia
Defendant:
Delmar L. Greenleaf, randall lankford, Salahuddin Abdur-Rahman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
