Cases 11 - 20 of 1,006
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04959
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04873
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Schmit et al v. Cox et al
as 1:2024cv04664
Plaintiff:
Heathermarie Conway, Randy L. Ireland, Mark Chronowitz and others
Defendant:
Ed Cox, Henry T. Berger, Peter S. Kosinski and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Liu v. All Nippon Airways Co., Ltd.
as 1:2024cv06391
Plaintiff:
Junxi Liu
Defendant:
All Nippon Airways Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 tt Fed. Question: Tort Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05275
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Xu et al v. Jaddou et al
as 2:2024cv05804
Defendant:
U.S Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Ur Mendoza Jaddou
Plaintiff:
Shenning Xu and Andrew Liu
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
Liu v. Healthfirst, Inc.
as 1:2024cv06125
Defendant:
Healthfirst, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Boxun Liu
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391 Personal Injury
Does et al v. New York City et al
as 1:2024cv04319
Defendant:
Lilmor Management LLC, David, Schiraldi and others
Plaintiff:
"John" Does and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cojon v. New Mikado Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04365
Defendant:
New Mikado Inc., Yao Yao Liu and Tengfei Fang
Plaintiff:
Policarpio Sucup Cojon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv05679
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
