Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Teamsters Local 386 v. Longs Drug Stores California, LLC d/b/a/ CVS/Pharmacy
as 2:2021at00708
Petitioner:
Teamsters Local 386
Defendant:
Longs Drug Stores California, LLC d/b/a/ CVS/Pharmacy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 185
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv00907
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv02630
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Nguyen et al v. CVS Pharmacy et al
as 3:2020cv01472
Defendant:
CVS Pharmacy, CVS Caremark, DOES 1 throught 100 and others
Plaintiff:
Amy Nguyen and Rafal Pytlik
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2020cv05283
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Garcia v. Longs Drug Stores California, LLC
as 1:2020at00243
Defendant:
Longs Drug Stores California, LLC
Plaintiff:
David Garcia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Assar v. Longs Drug Stores California, LLC
as 2:2019cv02086
Defendant:
Longs Drug Stores California, LLC and Longs Drug Stores California, LLC a limited liability company Doing business as CVS Health
Plaintiff:
Jaweed Assar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv05847
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2019cv02888
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Lane v. Albertson's Companies Inc. et al
as 4:2019cv02334
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc., CVS Health Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Ardys Lane
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
