Cases 11 - 20 of 44
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv01982
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Green v. The United States of America et al
as 1:2020cv00394
Defendant:
James A. Lovell Federal Health Care Center and The United States of America
Plaintiff:
Kaitlyn Green
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv08053
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Burberry Limited, a United Kingdom company et al v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 1:2019cv05793
Plaintiff:
Burberry Limited, a United Kingdom company and Burberry Limited, a New York corporation
Defendant:
The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", Gail Wagner, TOPBOSSPETS Store and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Clark v. Smith et al
as 3:2019cv00932
Defendant:
Michelle Neese, Robert Lovell, Amy Burle and others
Plaintiff:
Ramon Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pollion v. Simmons
as 3:2019cv03082
Respondent:
Doug Simmons
Not Yet Classified:
Habeas Attorney General
Petitioner:
Bryan Lovell Pollion
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lovell v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2018cv04223
Plaintiff:
Abbey J Lovell
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
CSS-Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv03472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Brandon v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2018cv01137
Plaintiff:
Fabian Brandon
Defendant:
John Baldwin, Marcus Hardy, Michael P Melvin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Blackman v. Group O, Inc.
as 1:2018cv00765
Plaintiff:
Lovell Blackman
Defendant:
Group O, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
