Cases 11 - 20 of 25
WRIGHT v. MURPHY et al
as 3:2021cv09443
Plaintiff:
AOLE BLACKMAN WRIGHT
Defendant:
LINDA FERNANDEZ, GOVERNOR PHIL MURPHY, WARDEN CHARLES ELLIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCRAE v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2021cv03565
Plaintiff:
MARCUS MCRAE
Defendant:
BRIAN M. HUGHES, CFG HEALTH SERVICES INS and WARDEN CHARLES ELLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HUGHES et al v. JOHNSON & JOHNSON et al
as 3:2020cv18473
Defendant:
PERSONAL CARE PRODUCTS COUNCIL (PCPC), JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER INC. and JOHNSON & JOHNSON
Plaintiff:
CYNTHIA M. HUGHES and MICHAEL LOCKWOOD, JR.
In Re:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON TALCUM POWDER PRODUCTS MARKETING, SALES PRACTICES AND PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NICKENS v. MERCER COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER et al
as 3:2020cv14489
Defendant:
MERCER COUNTY CORRECTIONAL CENTER, PHIL MURPHY, BRIAN M. HUGHES and others
Plaintiff:
GILBERT NICKENS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GRIGGER v. MERCER COUNTY CORRECTIONAL et al
as 3:2020cv14491
Defendant:
PHIL MURPHY, BRIAN M. HUGHES, MERCER COUNTY CORRECTIONAL and others
Plaintiff:
FREDERICK E. GRIGGER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WILLIAMS v. HUGHES et al
as 3:2019cv21391
Plaintiff:
JONATHAN D. WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BRIAN M. HUGHES, JOHN DOES 1-7 and RONALD P. EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv19785
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv18819
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv18819
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv17098
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
