Cases
Cases 11 - 19 of 19
Boris Bindman v. MH Sub I, LLC
as 20-15079
Defendant / Appellant: MH SUB I, LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company, DBA Internet Brands, Inc.
Plaintiff / Appellee: BORIS BINDMAN, a California resident, individually and on behalf of similarly situated persons
Verch v. Chapel Hills Vision, P.C.
as 1:2019cv02286
3Rd Party Plaintiff: Chapel Hills Vision, P.C.
Plaintiff: Marco Verch
3Rd Party Defendant: MH Sub I, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Express Mobile, Inc. v. MH Sub I LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv03352
Defendant: MH Sub I LLC
Plaintiff: Express Mobile, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 145
Bindman v. MH Sub I, LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2019cv02614
Plaintiff: Boris Bindman
Defendant: MH Sub I, LLC, INTERNET BRANDS, INC. and MH Sub I, LLC a Delaware Limited Liability Company doing business as Martindale-Nolo Lead Generation Program doing business as Martindale-Nolo Legal Marketing Network doing business as Nolo Experthub
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Alexander Bayonne Stross v. Internet Brands, Inc.
as 2:2018cv06642
Defendant: Internet Brands, Inc. and MH Sub I, LLC
Plaintiff: Alexander Bayonne Stross
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Mitchell Pohl v. MH SUB I LLC We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 18-13233
Plaintiff - Appellant: MITCHELL A. POHL, DDS
Defendant - Appellee: MH SUB I LLC, d.b.a. OFFICITE
Akerman v. WebMD Health Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv06132
Plaintiff: Morris Akerman
Defendant: WebMD Health Corp., Martin J. Wygod, Steven L. Zatz and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Berg v. WebMD Health Corp. et al
as 1:2017cv06064
Plaintiff: Robert Berg
Defendant: WebMD Health Corp., Martin J. Wygod, Steven L. Zatz and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
POHL v. MH SUB I LLC
as 4:2017cv00181
Plaintiff: MITCHELL A POHL
Defendant: MH SUB I LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?