Cases 11 - 20 of 21
BAILEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv56453
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAILEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv55309
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
NATHAN MICHAEL BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAILEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv30916
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
AARON MICHAEL BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAILEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv22312
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAILEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv05616
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAILEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv94685
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAILEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv75567
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BAILEY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv30779
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Bailey v. Baker County Florida et al
as 3:2020cv00045
Defendant:
James Crews, Scott Rhoden, Duval County Sheriff and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Bailey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2019cv62189
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
