Cases 11 - 15 of 15
White v. Michigan, State of et al
as 3:2018cv00438
Plaintiff:
Kala B. White
Defendant:
Michigan, State of, State of Michigan Department of State Police, State of Michigan Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richard C. Weber Jr. v. Ohio State Kaskalni et al
as 2:2018cv00745
Defendant:
Canton Toudrashi Unsled Sencelli, Colorado State University Sencelli, Creighton Unisled Sencelli and others
Plaintiff:
Richard C. Weber, Jr.
The Regents of the University of California et al v. GearLaunch, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv02280
Plaintiff:
The Regents of the University of California , Board of Trustees of the University of Alabama , Arizona Board of Regents and others
Defendant:
GearLaunch, Inc. and Thatcher Claflin Spring
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
State Treasurer of the State of Michigan et al v. Countrywide Financial Corporation et al
as 2:2011cv00809
Defendant:
ABN Amro Incorporated, BNP Paribas Securities Corp., BNY Mellon Capital Markets, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Michigan Judges Retirement System, Michigan State Police Retirement System, State Employees Retirement System and others
United States of America, State of California, State of Delaware, District of Columbia, State of Florida, State of Hawii, State of Illinois, State of Louisiana, Commonwealth of massachusetts, State of et al v. Eli Lilly & Company
as 3:2009cv03651
Plaintiff:
United States of America, State of California, State of Delaware, District of Columbia, State of Florida, State of Hawii, State of Illinois, State of Louisiana, Commonwealth of massachusetts, State of and State of Tennessee, State of Texas, Commonwealth of Virginia, State of Georgia, State of Indiana, State of Michigan, State of Montana, State of New Hampshire, State of New Mexico, State of New York, S
Defendant:
Eli Lilly & Company
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729 False Claims Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
