Cases 11 - 20 of 20
FENTON v. LUCKY'S OF DESTIN, LLC d/b/a LUCKY'S ROTTEN APPLE
as 3:2020cv05720
Plaintiff:
MARANDA FENTON
Defendant:
LUCKY'S OF DESTIN, LLC d/b/a LUCKY'S ROTTEN APPLE doing business as LUCKYS ROTTEN APPLE and LUCKY'S OF DESTIN LLC doing business as LUCKYS ROTTEN APPLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
EZELL v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 8:2020cv03137
Plaintiff:
MARANDA L EZELL
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
GREEN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv24841
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MARANDA GREEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Maranda v. Hash Deploy, Inc et al
as 5:2019cv00528
Defendant:
DOUGLAS SHOOK and HASH DEPLOY INC
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL MARANDA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Johansen v. Modrak
as 0:2018cv63120
Plaintiff:
J.K. Presley, Alexander Johansen and A.G. Johansen Presley
Defendant:
Elizabeth Borgman Skelly, Maria Fredriksson Skelly, Does 1-100 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101
MITCHELL v. BERRY et al
as 3:2017cv00962
Plaintiff:
ERIC MITCHELL
Defendant:
MARANDA BERRY, JONATHAN CAMPBELL, K MASON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00858
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00808
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Williams v. Maranda et al
as 1:2013cv22670
Plaintiff:
Terrence A. Williams
Defendant:
Cristina Maranda, Katherine Fernandez Rundle and Robert Barrar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Maranda v. Persels and Associates, LLC
as 8:2010cv02217
Plaintiff:
Gerald Maranda
Defendant:
Persels and Associates, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
