Cases 11 - 20 of 26
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv04134
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv02480
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Capik v. Eltman, Eltman & Cooper, P.C. et al
as 2:2012cv00046
Plaintiff:
Leslie Capik
Defendant:
Eltman, Eltman & Cooper, P.C., Mel S. Harris & Associates, LLC and Merriman Investments, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Capik v. Eltman, Eltman & Cooper, P.C. et al
as 1:2012cv00046
Plaintiff:
Leslie Capik
Defendant:
Eltman, Eltman & Cooper, P.C., Mel S. Harris & Associates, LLC and Merriman Investments, L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv06096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv06096
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv03035
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Petersen v. Mel S. Harris & Associates, LLC et al
as 1:2009cv04385
Plaintiff:
Jeval Petersen
Defendant:
Mel S. Harris & Associates, LLC and Rushmore Recoveries X LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2009cv61486
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
White v. Mel S. Harris Associates et al
as 6:2009cv06369
Plaintiff:
Willie E. White
Defendant:
Mel S. Harris Associates and Pin Point Technologies, LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
