Cases 11 - 20 of 33
Christopher Philip Langan v. Defense Finance & Accounting Service, et al
as 3:2014cv02563
Plaintiff:
Christopher Philip Langan
Defendant:
United States of America, United States Defense Finance and Accounting Service (DFAS), United States Department of Defense and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Muhammad v. Haag et al
as 1:2014cv01286
Plaintiff:
Malik Muhammad
Defendant:
Melinda Haag, Matthew L. McCarthy, Joseph C. Spero and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551
Ou-Young v. Roberts et al
as 4:2014mc80028
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young
Defendant:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Claudia Wilken, Edward M. Chen and others
Ou-Young v. Roberts et al
as 3:2014mc80018
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young
Defendant:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Claudia Wilken, Edward M. Chen and others
Ou-Young v. Roberts et al
as 5:2014mc80017
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young
Defendant:
John G. Roberts, Jr., Claudia Wilken, Edward M. Chen and others
Ou-Young v. Roberts et al
as 5:2013cv04442
Plaintiff:
Kuang-Bao P. Ou-Young
Defendant:
John Roberts, Jr., Claudia Wilken, Lucy Koh and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241
Bruzzone et al v. Intel Corporation et al
as 3:2013cv03729
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Bruzzone , Melinda Haag and Eric Holder
Defendant:
Intel Corporation, Dell, Inc. and International Data Group
Cause Of Action: 31 U.S.C. § 3729
City of Oakland v. Eric Holder, Jr., et al
as 13-15391
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CITY OF OAKLAND
Defendant - Appellee:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General, Attorney General of the United States and MELINDA HAAG, United States Attorney for the Northern District of California
City of Oakland v. Holder et al
as 3:2012cv05245
Plaintiff:
City of Oakland
Defendant:
Eric Holder and Melinda Haag
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Injunction
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 12-16710
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
