Cases 11 - 20 of 20
MILLER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv43727
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL F MILLER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MILLER v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv44762
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL E. MILLER
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MILLER v. MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
as 2:2011cv39014
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL W MILLER
Defendant:
MANVILLE CORPORATION ASBESTOS DISEASE COMPENSATION FUND
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MILLER v. ACANDS, INC.
as 2:2011cv39013
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL W. MILLER
Defendant:
ACANDS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MILLER v. UNITED STATES STEEL CORP.
as 2:2011cv39012
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL W. MILLER
Defendant:
UNITED STATES STEEL CORP.
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
MILLER v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv05236
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL D. MILLER
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION and DOES ONE THROUGH FIFTEEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
MILLER v. ASTRUE
as 2:2010cv04246
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL P. MILLER, SR.
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
MILLER et al v. ACANDS INCORPORATED et al
as 2:2009cv93119
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL H. MILLER
Defendant:
ACANDS INCORPORATED , ARMSTRONG WORLD , ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Miller v. Shannon et al
as 1:2008cv01849
Petitioner:
Michael J. Miller
Respondent:
Robert Shannon, . and PA Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MILLER et al v. OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2007cv60975
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL W MILLER and KATHY MILLER
Defendant:
OWENS-CORNING FIBERGLASS CORPORATION, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION, PITTSBURGH CORNING CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
