Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Madison Gas and Electric Comp., et al v. FERC
as 16-1019
Petitioner:
Madison Gas and Electric Company, Midwest Municipal Transmission Group, Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission and others
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Southern Illinois Power Cooperative, Inc. and Hoosier Energy Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc.
State of North Dakota, et al v. Beverly Heydinger, et al
as 14-2251
Plaintiff / Appellant:
State of North Dakota, Industrial Commission of North Dakota, Lignite Energy Council and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Beverly Heydinger, Commissioner and Chair, Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, David C. Boyd, Commissioner, Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, Nancy Lange, Commissioner and Vice Chair, Minnesota Public Utilities Commission and others
Appellant:
American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity, National Mining Association, Chamber of Commerce of the United States and others
Not Yet Classified:
Solar Energy Industries Association, Environmental Defense Fund, Environmental Law and Policy Center and others
State of North Dakota, et al v. Beverly Heydinger, et al
as 14-2156
Plaintiff / Appellee:
State of North Dakota, Industrial Commission of North Dakota, Lignite Energy Council and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Beverly Heydinger, Commissioner and Chair, Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, David C. Boyd, Commissioner, Minnesota Public Utilities Commission, Nancy Lange, Commissioner and Vice Chair, Minnesota Public Utilities Commission and others
Appellant:
American Wind Energy Association, Solar Energy Industries Association, Environmental Defense Fund and others
Not Yet Classified:
American Coalition for Clean Coal Electricity, National Mining Association, Chamber of Commerce of the United States and others
Midwest Independent Transmissi v. FERC
as 12-1027
Petitioner:
MIDWEST INDEPENDENT TRANSMISSION SYSTEM OPERATOR, INCORPORATED
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Intervenor - Intervening Petitioner:
MADISON GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY, MIDWEST MUNICIPAL TRANSMISSION GROUP, MISSOURI JOINT MUNICIPAL ELECTRIC UTILITY COMMISSION and others
Intervenor - Intervening Respondent:
INTERNATIONAL TRANSMISSION COMPANY, doing business as ITC TRANSMISSION, AMERICAN MUNICIPAL POWER, INC., FIRSTENERGY SERVICE COMPANY and others
Missouri Joint Municipal Elect v. EPA
as 10-1213
Petitioner:
Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
EPIC Merchant Energy LP, et al v. FERC
as 10-1217
Petitioner:
EPIC Merchant Energy LP, SESCO Enterprises, LLC and CAM Energy Trading, LLC
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Intervenor:
Public Service Company of Colorado, Southern Minnesota Municipal Power Agency, Southwestern Public Service Company and others
MO Joint Municipal Elec. Util. v. EPA
as 10-1124
Petitioner:
Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission
Respondent:
Environmental Protection Agency
Kennett, City Of v. Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission et al
as 1:2010cv00022
Plaintiff:
Kennett, City Of
Defendant:
Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission, Duncan Kincheloe, Eve Lissik and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Poplar Bluff, City of v. Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission et al
as 1:2010cv00023
Plaintiff:
Poplar Bluff, City of
Defendant:
Missouri Joint Municipal Electric Utility Commission, Duncan Kincheloe, Eve Lissik and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Otter Tail Power Company v. FERC
as 09-1209
Petitioner:
Otter Tail Power Company
Respondent:
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Movant-Intervenor For Respondent:
Great Lakes Utilities, Indiana Municipal Power Agency, Midwest Municipal Transmission Group and others
Movant-Intervenor For Petitioner:
Cargill Power Markets, LLC, DC Energy Midwest, LLC and Ameren Services Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
