Cases 11 - 20 of 55
Jenkins v. Northern Nevada Correctional Center et al
as 3:2022cv00461
Plaintiff:
Daysean Jenkins
Defendant:
Northern Nevada Correctional Center, Frazier, Medical Staff at NNCC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. NNCC et al
as 3:2022cv00531
Plaintiff:
Terrance E. Williams
Defendant:
Hodge, William Miller, Brendel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wright v. Frazier et al
as 3:2022cv00470
Plaintiff:
Donald Leon Wright
Defendant:
Frazier, Clark, NNCC Medical Staff and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. NNCC et al
as 3:2022cv00464
Plaintiff:
Terrance Williams
Defendant:
NNCC, Edison Rojas, Bikasan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. NNCC
as 3:2022cv00382
Plaintiff:
Terrance E. Williams
Defendant:
NNCC and Northern Nevada Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. N.D.O.C. et al
as 3:2022cv00298
Petitioner:
Terrance E. Williams
Respondent:
N.D.O.C., Russel, Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Louis Randolph v. Brian Williams, Sr., et al
as 22-15385
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LOUIS A. RANDOLPH, AKA Clyde Lewis
Defendant / Appellee:
BRIAN WILLIAMS, Sr., JAMES STOGNER, Chaplain NNCC, JUSTIN, swald Justin Reyes per [43] -Food Staff Manager (SDCC) and others
Williams v. NNCC
as 3:2022cv00048
Plaintiff:
Terrance E. Williams
Defendant:
NNCC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lujan v. Daniels et al
as 2:2021cv01623
Plaintiff:
Michael V. Lujan
Defendant:
Charles Daniels, NDOC and NNCC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. NNCC et al
as 3:2021cv00287
Plaintiff:
Terrance E. Williams
Defendant:
NNCC, Perry Russell and Bikasan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
