Cases 11 - 20 of 24
COCHRAN et al v. MERCK & CO., INC. et al
as 3:2019cv16866
Defendant:
MCKESSON CORP., MERCK SHARP AND DOHME CORP. and MERCK & CO., INC.
Plaintiff:
LAURA COCHRAN and ANTONIO NAVA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NAVA v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2018cv16229
Defendant:
MERCK, SHARP & DOHME CORPORATION, ASTRAZENECA LP and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
Plaintiff:
SUSIE NAVA
In Re:
PROTON-PUMP INHIBITOR PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION (NO.II)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NAVA v. JOHNSON AND JOHNSON et al
as 3:2017cv12427
Plaintiff:
AMEY NAVA
Defendant:
JOHNSON AND JOHNSON, JOHNSON AND JOHNSON CONSUMER INC., IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NAVA v. JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. et al
as 3:2017cv05189
Plaintiff:
ALICIA NAVA
Defendant:
JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS INC., JANSSEN RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT LLC, JOHNSON & JOHNSON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Granillo et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 3:2016cv00153
Plaintiff:
Dolores Granillo, Albert Granillo and Desiree Nava
Defendant:
FCA US LLC. and DOES
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv03895
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv06594
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv04715
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv02798
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
MORALES v. KEATING et al
as 1:2014cv00535
Plaintiff:
JASON MORALES
Defendant:
SGT. KEATING, SGT. NAVAS, C.O. JENNINGS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
