Cases 11 - 20 of 28
NERI v. ASTRAZENECA LP et al
as 2:2018cv04760
Plaintiff:
PASQUALE NERI
Defendant:
ASTRAZENECA LP and ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
LORA v. JCPENNEY et al
as 2:2016cv08456
Plaintiff:
NERY LORA
Defendant:
JCPENNEY, JCPENNEY OF GARDEN STATE PLAZA, JCPENNEY CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv07837
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
NERI et al v. NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE et al
as 3:2015cv02947
Plaintiff:
PHILIP G. NERI, PAUL COLON and DOUGLAS COOK
Defendant:
NEW JERSEY STATE PAROLE, JAMES PLOUSIS and DAVID THOMAS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CORTIJO v. ROSALES et al
as 2:2015cv01174
Plaintiff:
CARLOS R CORTIJO
Defendant:
NERY ROSALES, RHODY TRANSPORTATION AND WAREHOUSING, INC. and JOHN DOES I-XX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NERI v. BEUCHELE et al
as 1:2014cv07656
Petitioner:
PHILIP G. NERI
Respondent:
NJ STATE PAROLE BOARD and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEW JERSEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
NERI v. PENNSAUKEN LIBRARY et al
as 1:2014cv06805
Plaintiff:
PHILIP NERI
Defendant:
PENNSAUKEN LIBRARY, PENNSAUKEN TOWNSHIP, ANTHONY DIMIMEO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WEBSTER et al v. N.J. PAROLE
as 3:2014cv06739
Plaintiff:
JAMES WEBSTER, ANTHONY PEARSON, TYREEN WALKER and others
Defendant:
N.J. PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv04367
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
NERI v. MID STATE et al
as 1:2013cv04555
Petitioner:
PHILIP G. NERI
Respondent:
MID STATE, D.O.C. and NJ PAROLE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
