Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Guzman Picot v. Mapfre Insurance Company et al
as 3:2020cv11261
Plaintiff:
Albertina Guzman Picot and Albertina Guzman Picot on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated doing business as Salon Cabellos
Defendant:
Mapfre Insurance Company and College Highway Insurance Agency, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv11031
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Delvecchio et al v. Town Sports International, LLC et al
as 1:2020cv10666
Plaintiff:
Tony J Proctor, Others Similarly Situated, Duncan K Johnson and others
Defendant:
Town Sports International, LLC and Town Sports International Holdings, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Saitta et al v. Protalus, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv12156
Plaintiff:
Nevina Saitta, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated, Ronald Saitta and Nevina Saitta
Defendant:
Protalus USA, LLC, Protalus Holdings, LLC and Protalus, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv40139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Costa v. Nissan North America, Inc.
as 1:2018cv11523
Plaintiff:
Krista Costa, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Krista Costa
Defendant:
Nissan North America, Inc., a California corporation and Nissan North America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Roscoe, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc.
as 1:2017cv12332
Defendant:
Toyota Motor Sales U.S.A., Inc.
Plaintiff:
Ray Roscoe, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Cause Of Action: 02 U.S.C. § 431 Fed. Election Commission: Failure Enforce C
Pinchuck, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated v. Termeer et al
as 1:2010cv11776
Plaintiff:
Warren Pinchuck, Individually, and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
Henri A Termeer, Michael S Wyzga, Robert J. Carpenter and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Citizens for Consume, et al v. Abbott Laboratories,, et al
as 1:2001cv12257
Plaintiff:
Citizens for Consumer Justice , Colorado Progressive Coalition , Congress of California Seniors and others
Defendant:
Allergan Worldwide , Astrazeneca US , Bayer, AG and others
Consolidated_plaintiff:
Shirley Geller , United Food & Commercial Workers Unions and Employers Midest Health Benefits Fund , Action Alliance of Senior Citizens of Greater Philadelphia and others
Consolidated_defendant:
Baxter Pharmaceutical Products, Inc. , Fujisawa Pharmaceut, Monsanto CO. and others
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Roberta S. Starks , Kimberly K. Hoover , National Automatic Sprinkler Industry Welfare Fund and others
Amicu:
Secretary of Health and Human Services
Intervenor:
Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and Commonwealth of Massachusetts
Intervenor_defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY a/k/a BRISTOL-MYERS ONCOLOGY DIVISION/HIV PRODUCTS , GENSIA SICOR, INC., Novartis AG and others
Movant:
Empire Blue Cross Blue Shield , Tufts Associated Health Maintenance Organization, Inc., Neighborhood Health Plan, Inc. and others
Adr_provider:
Eric Green and Jonathan Marks
Respondent:
Luis E. Cobo
Objector:
Patricia Weatherly and James W. Wilson
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Plumbers' Union Local No. 12 Pension Fund, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Nomura Asset Acceptance Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv10446
Defendant:
Nomura Asset Acceptance Corporation, Nomura Asset Acceptance Corporation, John P. Graham and others
Plaintiff:
Plumbers' Union Local No. 12 Pension Fund, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated and Plumbers' Union Local No. 12 Pension Fund, Individually and On Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
