Cases 11 - 20 of 29
Peabody Coal Company v. U.S. Department of Labor, Offi, et al
as 12-4366
Petitioner:
PEABODY COAL COMPANY
Respondent:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR
Peabody Coal Company v. DOWCP
as 12-2087
Petitioner:
PEABODY COAL COMPANY
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and JOAN LUSK, Widow of Ralph Lusk
Peabody Coal Company v. DOWCP
as 12-1978
Petitioner:
PEABODY COAL COMPANY
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and MARY ELLEN MORGAN, Widow of Don Morgan
Peabody Coal Co. v. Shirley Wells, et al
as 12-3859
Petitioner:
PEABODY COAL CO.
Respondent:
SHIRLEY WELLS, Widow of Ronald J. Wells and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES
Peabody Coal Company v. Dir Office of Workers' Comp, et al
as 12-3568
Petitioner:
PEABODY COAL COMPANY
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKER'S COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and VIRGIL BRIGANCE
Peabody Coal Company v. OWCP, et al
as 12-70535
Petitioner:
PEABODY COAL COMPANY
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and ROBERT DALE OPP, Deceased
Albert Hall v. OWCP
as 12-1275
Petitioner:
ALBERT HALL
Respondent:
OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS
Party-in-Interest:
PEABODY COAL COMPANY
Peabody Coal Co. v. Billy Belt, et al
as 11-4379
Petitioner:
PEABODY COAL CO.
Respondent:
BILLY E. BELT and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES
Caselyn Brown v. Peabody Coal Company, et al
as 10-3375
Petitioner:
CASELYN BROWN, widow of William R. Brown
Respondent:
PEABODY COAL COMPANY and DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES
Peabody Coal Company v. DOWCP
as 09-2400
Petitioner:
PEABODY COAL COMPANY
Respondent:
DIRECTOR, OFFICE OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION PROGRAMS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR and S.P.W.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
