Cases 11 - 20 of 69
Trammell v. People of State of California
as 5:2020cv02367
Respondent:
People of State of California
Petitioner:
Nicholas Kenneth Trammell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hawks v. Billeci
as 3:2020cv01622
Interested Party:
People of State of California
Respondent:
Todd Billeci
Petitioner:
Richard Hawks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
John Sylvester Crawford v. LA County Superior Court et al
as 2:2020cv00263
Respondent:
LA County Superior Court and People of State of California
Petitioner:
John Sylvester Crawford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lopez-Barraza v. People of State of California
as 5:2019cv02963
Petitioner:
Alberto Lopez-Barraza
Respondent:
People of State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(HC) Hickman v. People of State of California
as 2:2018cv02967
Petitioner:
Kevin Duane Hickman
Respondent:
People of State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
City of Eureka et al v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 1:2018cv05353
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC, Purdue Pharma, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
City of Eureka and The People of State of California
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Michael Moran v. Martin Biter, et al
as 18-15869
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL ANTHONY MORAN
Respondent - Appellee:
MARTIN BITER, Warden, Kern Valley State Prison, Delano, California and PEOPLE OF STATE OF CALIFORNIA
Roberto Jacobo Reyes v. William L. Muniz et al
as 8:2017cv01445
Respondent:
William L. Muniz and People of State of California
Petitioner:
Roberto Jacobo Reyes
Marvin Eugene Jones et al v. People of State of California et al
as 5:2017cv01291
Defendant:
Abella, CO Nelson, Captain Lee and others
Plaintiff:
Marvin Eugene Jones
Clarence A Gipbsin v. People of State of California
as 2:2017cv02656
Petitioner:
Clarence A. Gipbsin
Respondent:
People of State of California
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
