Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Frederick et al v. Qualcomm Incorporated
as 3:2017cv00377
Plaintiff:
Scott Frederick , Charles Poon , Andrea Hogan and others
Defendant:
Qualcomm Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0002
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv05381
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2016cv02756
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 794
Appenrodt v. United States of America et al
as 3:2016cv02010
Defendant:
Damon Poon, John A. Koskinen and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Appenrodt
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7609
Josh Crystal v. Medbox, Inc. et al
as 2:2015cv00426
Plaintiff:
Josh Crystal and Mike Jones
Defendant:
Medbox, Inc, Medbox, Inc., Pejman Vincent Mehdizadeh and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Peter Phan, Paul Poon, Ervin Gutierrez and others
Petitioner:
Hugo Colindres, Nancy Fox, Michael Konar and others
Yonglei Zhang v. Cheongwha Chang et al
as 2:2014cv08819
Defendant:
CKB International Marketing, CKB Max, CKB168 Holdings Ltd and others
Plaintiff:
Yonglei Zhang
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2014cv04584
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cabusas v. Mortgage Electronic Systems, Inc.
as 5:2012cv03000
Defendant:
Mortgage Electronic Systems, Inc., Jerry Halbrook, Banc of America Alternative Loan Trust 2006-9 and others
Plaintiff:
Pedro Bercasio, Epsom Almazan, Norma Cabusas and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ward et al v. Rance King Properties, Inc.
as 2:2012cv01362
Defendant:
Rance King Properties, Inc., Christopher Poon and Florence Poon
Plaintiff:
Michael Ward , Crystal Ward , I.W., a minor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2012cv00547
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
