Cases 11 - 20 of 42
Dube v. Rexall Sundown, Inc.
as 2:2017cv01510
Plaintiff:
Briana Dube
Defendant:
Rexall Sundown, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Dube v. Rexall Sundown, Inc.
as 1:2017cv01510
Plaintiff:
Briana Dube
Defendant:
Rexall Sundown, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Baliram v. Rexall Sundown, Inc. et al
as 0:2016cv61766
Plaintiff:
Samraj Baliram
Defendant:
Rexall Sundown, Inc. , NBTY, Inc. and XYZ Entities 1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Muir v. NBTY, Inc. et al
as 1:2015cv09835
Defendant:
NBTY, Inc., Rexall Sundown, Inc., Nature's Origin, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Muir
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Petkevicius v. Rexall Sundown, Inc. et al
as CAS/3:14-cv-02482
Plaintiff:
Paige Petkevicius
Defendant:
Rexall Sundown, Inc. and Does 1-20
Petkevicius v. Rexall Sundown, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv02482
Plaintiff:
Paige Petkevicius
Defendant:
Rexall Sundown, Inc. and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lary v. Healthcare Data Experts, LLC
as 1:2014cv02746
Plaintiff:
John H. Lary, Jr.
Defendant:
Healthcare Data Experts, LLC , Corporate Mailings, Inc. , Rexall Sundown, Inc. and others
Lary v. Healthcare Data Experts, LLC
as 1:2014mi00087
Plaintiff:
John H. Lary, Jr.
Defendant:
Healthcare Data Experts, LLC , Corporate Mailings, Inc. , Rexall Sundown, Inc. and others
NBTY, Inc. et al v. Quest Productions, LLC et al
as 2:2014cv02435
Plaintiff:
NBTY, Inc., Rexall Sundown, Inc. and United States Nutrition, Inc.
Defendant:
George Gregory Plitt, Jr. and Quest Productions, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Nick Pearson, et al v. Target Corporation, et al
as 14-1227
Plaintiff - Appellant:
NICK PEARSON, FRANCISCO PADILLA, CECILIA LINARES and others
Defendant - Appellee:
TARGET CORPORATION, REXALL SUNDOWN, INC., a Florida corporation and NBTY, INC., a Delaware corporation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
