Cases 11 - 20 of 22
Drame v. Gonzales et al
as 5:2016cv03257
Petitioner:
Daouda Drame
Respondent:
Alberto Gonzales , Michael Chertoff , Ricardo Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Eniola v. Lynch et al
as 5:2015cv03164
Petitioner:
Eni Oyegoke Eniola
Respondent:
Loretta Lynch, Jeh Johnson, Ricardo Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Sunda v. Holder et al
as 5:2013cv03174
Petitioner:
Douglas Sunda
Respondent:
Eric Holder, Rand Beers, Ricardo Wong and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Limon v. USA
as 2:2013cv02441
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ricardo Limon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Heinrich v. Wong et al
as 5:2013cv03133
Petitioner:
Antonella Heinrich
Respondent:
Ricardo Wong , Todd Nay , Greg Perez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ortega-Saucedo v. USA
as 2:2012cv02733
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Ricardo Ortega-Saucedo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Rusan-El v. United States Bureau of Prisons et al
as 5:2010cv03124
Petitioner:
Ricardo Lamont Rusan-El
Respondent:
United States Bureau of Prisons, United States Penitentiary of Leavenworth and Claude Chester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Rusan v. Chester
as 5:2010cv03070
Petitioner:
Ricardo Rusan
Respondent:
Claude Chester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Rusan v. Chester
as 5:2010cv03046
Petitioner:
Ricardo Rusan
Respondent:
(fnu) Chester
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Dz Bank AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank v. Adam Peters Agency, Inc. et al
as 2:2010cv02126
Plaintiff:
Dz Bank AG Deutsche Zentral-Genossenschaftsbank
Defendant:
Adam Peters Agency, Inc., Renate Aldridge, All General Lines Insurance, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Default
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
